Thursday, April 20, 2006

You HAVE. TO. SEE. THIS. POST. I PMRFLMAO. Go see and let me know what you think.

Here it is

12 Comments:

At 8:00 pm, Blogger Kili @ Live Each Moment said...

Thanks for visiting my site. Glad you liked the post.
Kristina

 
At 8:32 pm, Blogger 4 girls and 3 boys said...

Ace link D. Thanks

 
At 2:44 am, Blogger d34dpuppy said...

those babies r so funny

 
At 7:41 am, Blogger Donna said...

That's set me up for the day, that has! Absolutely priceless. Thanks for sharing the laugh :-)

 
At 9:40 am, Blogger Lindsey said...

Shocked!! I can't believe someone can do this to the face of a child! For one thing I'd be gutted if I found my childs face circulating the net as the source of other peoples amusement! And for another I'd be gutted if I grew up and found my parents had actually given permission for this to be done. Why deface a child as an outlet for creativity? I don't get it PMSL. And why assume it's OK when the child is too young to give permission for this kind of *fun* himself?

 
At 10:25 am, Blogger FOUR DINNERS said...

I see where lindsey's comin' from. You have to be a bit careful with kid's n't net for obvious reasons but I think in this case assumin' the baby grows up with a sense of humour he/she'll crack up if they're shown it. Gene n Shrek are particularly brill.

Ta f't link D. LOL as they say!

 
At 12:13 pm, Blogger Qalballah said...

Yes I can see how some people would be offended at seeing a cute baby on the internet being made to look like an idiot, but if that was my picture and I was looking at it as an adult I would be PMSRFLMAO. But then I don't really have much of a chip about humour or laughing at myself (hey, with hips like mine you have to have a sense of humour...)

 
At 2:35 pm, Blogger 4 girls and 3 boys said...

Erm the childs face wasn't actually defaced tho was it? It was done by graphics. I could understand concern if the child had been face painted and stuff glued on but it wasn't - was it? I hope not or did I miss the point?
Also as for laughing -if someone has posted a picture of a baby an said look at this and laughed at it cos they thought it was odd looking or whatever - yes that would have been mean and cruel but I don't see how this is. And yes we have done it to our own kids pictures and ourselves. They didn't mind either. Neither did I. It was just fun!

 
At 5:02 pm, Blogger Edward Ott said...

That is hilarious, somebody had a lot of fun with photoshop.

Salam

 
At 7:26 pm, Blogger Elder Faery said...

Nah. I don't get it. I really don't. I was shocked by it actually.. I have had this argument with my big bro already cos he kept sending me things he found off the internet that he found + thought were amusing,,and I just did not get them. I was shocked and offended and confused by most of them. He was really hurt when i asked him to stop cos he (and apparently everyone he knew EXCEPT me) all agreed they were hilarious. Nobody can explain it to me..but I gotta tell you..those pics were funny-peculiar and not funny-ha!ha! But I know for a fact if I send them to my bro he'll keel over laughing! Still, please don't no-one get the huff..it was also a good one to think about..I mean we've all got different senses of humour as well!!! But I will go back now and try to see what is funny cos I'd really like to be in on it somehow...x

 
At 7:55 pm, Blogger Qalballah said...

I think it is the juxtaposition of something cute and innocent and little with images of horror and grrr and the adult world. Plus the expression on the baby is funny. I mean if you analyse it it just isn't frigging funny, no. I think the humour comes from the unexpected nature of it. But I've stopped laughing now.

 
At 5:12 am, Blogger Maya Lee said...

That was cool.


carports

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Locations of visitors to this page

education otherwise